I believe this book is important to be heard by the public. The topic of the novel is not based on just cell research and discoveries, but an issue regarding human rights. I believe in the statement issued by the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights stating, “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.” Henrietta Locks was not treated like a human, but instead like a cell named HeLa.
I imagine the challenge Rebecca Skloot faced was trying to write the novel in a way so people not associated to the medical background would understand. The author had to find the balance and able to discuss the scientific stand point versus a public stand point on the topic. At the same time, Skloot had to stay neutral in the argument, and provide the readers with informative information on both sides.
As a reader, a challenge I would anticipate is having the ability to be committed to one side of the argument; was it fair for scientists to have used Henrietta cells without her consent? Henrietta cells where the first human cells grown in culture, and therefore became a huge component in vital scientific discoveries. For instance, the use of her cells enabled scientists to uncover secrets to cancer, create polio vaccines, and discover effects of the atomic bomb. On the other hand, I do not agree in the Hela cell research for two reasons. As discussed in the first paragraph, like all humans, Henrietta was entitled to all human rights. Since she wasn’t aware of her cell distribution; her body was being used without her consent. Second, Henrietta’s cells produced a multi-million dollar industry; yet, her family suffered from poverty, and was not able to afford health care. The Locke family found out twenty years after Henrietta’s death, and wasn’t involved in any of the medical process or amazing medical discoveries. This novel discusses many important topics that are not just related to medical issues, but issues of our society.
The blog post by Caroline Bauer about the book TILOHL discusses similar views on the same issues that I spoke about in my blog. She was in agreement with the importance of this book being heard by the public. Her argument for this was that all human rights should be upheld and no one should be able to infringe upon those rights. This specific issue of human rights is an issue that the book presents in many forms. The obstacles that Rebecca Skloot would face, according to Caroline, while writing this novel was that she had to find a healthy balance between the scientific and public points of view. She thought that this healthy balance was very important because it was vital to the books consistency to remain neutral. Caroline does not agree with the research that was performed on Henrietta. Her comments on the challenges Rebecca Skloot could stumble upon while writing this book were interesting and were conveyed in a very convincing manner. I agree with a lot of what Caroline was conveying to her audience. I completely agree with Caroline’s view on human rights and how it relates to Henrietta in this book because everyone has a right to know what is going on with their body. No one should be a secret science experiment and have no idea that they participated in such experiment. Also, I agreed with Caroline’s opinion on the Hela cell research. I think that Henrietta and her family should have been compensated beyond imaginable for what happened. There is no way that her family should have been kept in the dark for so long about this after her death, another view Caroline and I shared. Henrietta was an extraordinary person with impeccable DNA and should have been given the recognition she deserved. Caroline discusses interesting points of view that are easy to relate to. Overall, I enjoyed reading Caroline's blog and think that she did a good job expressing her opinions and ideas clearly.
ReplyDelete